aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorZhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>2024-11-11 17:08:07 +0800
committerDavid Oberhollenzer <david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at>2024-11-11 10:32:46 +0100
commit59dd2cf5ad8e32c7b38b3287b9d05a2d809e93e4 (patch)
tree2befa580b46a60f2abd91981af43215059f4fe44 /ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs
parentd0b66b0e5bb346e795a4c0ac3cafd287a6e4db9d (diff)
fsck.ubifs: Check whether the TNC is empty
This is the 11/18 step of fsck. Check whether the TNC is empty, turn to rebuild_fs if it is not found. Can we recreate a new root dir to avoid empty TNC? The answer is no, lpt fixing should be done before creating new entry, but lpt fixing needs a committing before new dirty data generated to ensure that bud data won't be overwritten(bud LEB could become freeable after replaying journal, corrected lpt may treat it as a free one to hold new data, see details in space checking & correcting step). Then we have to create the new root dir after fixing lpt and a committing, znode without children(empty TNC) maybe written on disk at the moment of committing, which corrupts the UBIFS image. So we choose to rebuild the filesystem if the TNC is empty, this case is equivalent to corrupted TNC. Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David Oberhollenzer <david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at>
Diffstat (limited to 'ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs')
-rw-r--r--ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/check_files.c25
-rw-r--r--ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/fsck.ubifs.c7
-rw-r--r--ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/fsck.ubifs.h4
-rw-r--r--ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/problem.c1
4 files changed, 36 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/check_files.c b/ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/check_files.c
index 2be9619..b9f31a7 100644
--- a/ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/check_files.c
+++ b/ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/check_files.c
@@ -499,3 +499,28 @@ int handle_dentry_tree(struct ubifs_info *c)
return 0;
}
+
+/**
+ * tnc_is_empty - Check whether the TNC is empty.
+ * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
+ *
+ * Returns %true if the TNC is empty, otherwise %false is returned.
+ */
+bool tnc_is_empty(struct ubifs_info *c)
+{
+ /*
+ * Check whether the TNC is empty, turn to rebuild_fs if it is empty.
+ * Can we recreate a new root dir to avoid empty TNC? The answer is no,
+ * lpt fixing should be done before creating new entry, but lpt fixing
+ * needs a committing before new dirty data generated to ensure that
+ * bud data won't be overwritten(bud LEB could become freeable after
+ * replaying journal, corrected lpt may treat it as a free one to hold
+ * new data, see details in space checking & correcting step). Then we
+ * have to create the new root dir after fixing lpt and a committing,
+ * znode without children(empty TNC) maybe written on disk at the
+ * moment of committing, which corrupts the UBIFS image. So we choose
+ * to rebuild the filesystem if the TNC is empty, this case is
+ * equivalent to corrupted TNC.
+ */
+ return c->zroot.znode->child_cnt == 0;
+}
diff --git a/ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/fsck.ubifs.c b/ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/fsck.ubifs.c
index 3f61668..cd498f5 100644
--- a/ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/fsck.ubifs.c
+++ b/ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/fsck.ubifs.c
@@ -467,6 +467,12 @@ static int do_fsck(void)
goto free_disconnected_files;
}
+ log_out(c, "Check whether the TNC is empty");
+ if (tnc_is_empty(c) && fix_problem(c, EMPTY_TNC, NULL)) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ FSCK(c)->try_rebuild = true;
+ }
+
free_disconnected_files:
destroy_file_list(c, &FSCK(c)->disconnected_files);
free_used_lebs:
@@ -512,6 +518,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
* Step 8: Check and handle invalid files
* Step 9: Check and handle unreachable files
* Step 10: Check and correct files
+ * Step 11: Check whether the TNC is empty
*/
err = do_fsck();
if (err && FSCK(c)->try_rebuild) {
diff --git a/ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/fsck.ubifs.h b/ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/fsck.ubifs.h
index 32a991d..3c0f2af 100644
--- a/ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/fsck.ubifs.h
+++ b/ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/fsck.ubifs.h
@@ -43,7 +43,8 @@ enum { SB_CORRUPTED = 0, MST_CORRUPTED, LOG_CORRUPTED, BUD_CORRUPTED,
FILE_HAS_0_NLINK_INODE, FILE_HAS_INCONSIST_TYPE, FILE_HAS_TOO_MANY_DENT,
FILE_SHOULDNT_HAVE_DATA, FILE_HAS_NO_DENT, XATTR_HAS_NO_HOST,
XATTR_HAS_WRONG_HOST, FILE_HAS_NO_ENCRYPT, FILE_IS_DISCONNECTED,
- FILE_ROOT_HAS_DENT, DENTRY_IS_UNREACHABLE, FILE_IS_INCONSISTENT };
+ FILE_ROOT_HAS_DENT, DENTRY_IS_UNREACHABLE, FILE_IS_INCONSISTENT,
+ EMPTY_TNC };
enum { HAS_DATA_CORRUPTED = 1, HAS_TNC_CORRUPTED = 2 };
@@ -318,5 +319,6 @@ int traverse_tnc_and_construct_files(struct ubifs_info *c);
void update_files_size(struct ubifs_info *c);
int handle_invalid_files(struct ubifs_info *c);
int handle_dentry_tree(struct ubifs_info *c);
+bool tnc_is_empty(struct ubifs_info *c);
#endif
diff --git a/ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/problem.c b/ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/problem.c
index e8f0860..795f05f 100644
--- a/ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/problem.c
+++ b/ubifs-utils/fsck.ubifs/problem.c
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static const struct fsck_problem problem_table[] = {
{PROBLEM_FIXABLE | PROBLEM_MUST_FIX | PROBLEM_DROP_DATA, "Root dir should not have a dentry"}, // FILE_ROOT_HAS_DENT
{PROBLEM_FIXABLE | PROBLEM_MUST_FIX | PROBLEM_DROP_DATA, "Dentry is unreachable"}, // DENTRY_IS_UNREACHABLE
{PROBLEM_FIXABLE | PROBLEM_MUST_FIX, "File is inconsistent"}, // FILE_IS_INCONSISTENT
+ {PROBLEM_FIXABLE | PROBLEM_MUST_FIX | PROBLEM_DROP_DATA | PROBLEM_NEED_REBUILD, "TNC is empty"}, // EMPTY_TNC
};
static const char *get_question(const struct fsck_problem *problem,