diff options
author | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> | 2019-06-01 12:43:23 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | David Oberhollenzer <david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at> | 2019-06-01 19:38:44 +0200 |
commit | e5530fea6a3e094e83303749c20622f0af12f21f (patch) | |
tree | da136c9e8a6d9f132d040eaae667c54f91094011 /tests/unittests/sysfs_mock/class/ubi | |
parent | 51d8c731a20a6fbb1f746a166a85a07a7063d0e8 (diff) |
mkfs.ubifs: Add ZSTD compression
I added ZSTD support to mkfs.ubifs and compared the ZSTD results with
zlib/lzo and the available ZSTD compression levels. The results are in
the following table:
Comp image MiB time image2 MiB time
none 271 0m 0,723s 223 0m 0,589s
lzo 164 0m13,705s 116 0m11,636s
zlib 150 0m 7,654s 103 0m 6,347s
favor-lzo 158 0m21,137s 110 0m17,764s
zstd-01 154 0m 1,607s 106 0m 1,429s
zstd-02 153 0m 1,704s 105 0m 1,479s
zstd-03* 152 0m 1,888s 104 0m 1,668s
zstd-04 151 0m 2,741s 103 0m 2,391s
zstd-05 150 0m 3,257s 102 0m 2,916s
zstd-06 150 0m 3,735s 102 0m 3,356s
zstd-07 150 0m 4,066s 102 0m 3,705s
zstd-08 152 0m 1,857s 104 0m 1,644s
zstd-09 152 0m 1,855s 104 0m 1,639s
zstd-10 150 0m 6,654s 102 0m 6,195s
zstd-11 150 0m10,027s 102 0m 9,130s
zstd-12 149 0m14,724s 101 0m13,415s
zstd-13 148 0m18,232s 100 0m16,719s
zstd-14 148 0m20,859s 100 0m19,554s
zstd-15 148 0m25,033s 100 0m23,186s
zstd-16 148 0m38,837s 100 0m36,543s
zstd-17 148 0m46,051s 100 0m43,120s
zstd-18 148 0m49,157s 100 0m45,807s
zstd-19 148 0m49,421s 100 0m45,951s
zstd-20 148 0m51,271s 100 0m48,030s
zstd-21 148 0m51,015s 100 0m48,676s
zstd-22 148 0m52,575s 100 0m50,013s
The UBIFS image was created via
mkfs.ubifs -x $Comp -m 512 -e 128KiB -c 2200 -r $image $out
I used "debootstrap sid" to create a basic RFS and the results are in
the `image' column. The image2 column denotes the results for the same
image but with .deb files removed.
The time column contains the output of the run time of the command.
ZSTD's compression level three is currently default. Based on the
compression results (for the default level) it outperforms LZO in
run time and compression and is almost as good as ZLIB in terms of
compression but quicker.
The higher compression levels make almost no difference in compression
but take a lot of time.
The compression level used is the default offered by ZSTD. It does not
make sense the higher levels.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Signed-off-by: David Oberhollenzer <david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/unittests/sysfs_mock/class/ubi')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions