| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Send one packet from each eraseblock in turn, rather than all packets
for one eraseblock together. This means that bursts of loss are evenly
spread between blocks. It also makes the client side a bit more complex
if you can't assume that there's anywhere except the flash to store its
intermediate data.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
in round-robin fashion rather than full blocks one at a time.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Paper: http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/mccr6.ps.gz
Code: http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/rmdp980703.tgz
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
It just busy-waits until it's time to send the next packet now. Which
sucks, but gives us good timing for debugging. Needs work (and actually
if we have hrtimers we probably _can_ sleep and still have proper
timing).
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
