diff options
author | Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> | 2008-01-16 17:35:41 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> | 2008-01-16 17:35:41 +0200 |
commit | d78b73e2ca216777e17066091ef449e9cdaffae7 (patch) | |
tree | 082198023b2dcc680252a05b9d50475c4048c430 /checkfs/README | |
parent | 396643e2cbf05cdc3d2a8fa34cf2d4f8cc1d8441 (diff) |
tests: move checkfs test to tests directory
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'checkfs/README')
-rw-r--r-- | checkfs/README | 173 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 173 deletions
diff --git a/checkfs/README b/checkfs/README deleted file mode 100644 index d9966a5..0000000 --- a/checkfs/README +++ /dev/null @@ -1,173 +0,0 @@ -$Id: README,v 1.2 2001/06/21 23:07:06 dwmw2 Exp $ -$Log: README,v $ -Revision 1.2 2001/06/21 23:07:06 dwmw2 -Initial import to MTD CVS - -Revision 1.1 2001/06/11 19:34:40 vipin -Added README file to dir. - - -This is the README file for the "checkfs" power fail test program. -By: Vipin Malik - -NOTE: This program requires an external "power cycling box" -connected to one of the com ports of the system under test. -This power cycling box should wait for a random amount of time -after it receives a "ok to power me down" message over the -serial port, and then yank power to the system under test. -(The box that I rigged up tested with waits anywhere from -0 to ~40 seconds). - - -It should then restore power after a few seconds and wait for the -message again. - - -ABOUT: - -This program's primary purpose it to test the reliiability -of various file systems under Linux. - -SETUP: - -You need to setup the file system you want to test and run the -"makefiles" program ONCE. This creates a set of files that are -required by the "checkfs" program. - -Also copy the "checkfs" executable program to the same dir. - -Then you need to make sure that the program "checkfs" is called -automatically on startup. You can customise the operation of -the "checkfs" program by passing it various cmd line arguments. -run "checkfs -?" for more details. - -****NOTE******* -Make sure that you call the checkfs program only after you have -mounted the file system you want to test (this is obvious), but -also after you have run any "scan" utilities to check for and -fix any file systems errors. The e2fsck is one utility for the -ext2 file system. For an automated setup you of course need to -provide these scan programs to run in standalone mode (-f -y -flags for e2fsck for example). - -File systems like JFFS and JFFS2 do not have any such external -utilities and you may call "checkfs" right after you have mounted -the respective file system under test. - -There are two ways you can mount the file system under test: - -1. Mount your root fs on a "standard" fs like ext2 and then -mount the file system under test (which may be ext2 on another -partition or device) and then run "checkfs" on this mounted -partition OR - -2. Make your fs AND device that you have put this fs as your -root fs and run "checkfs" on the root device (i.e. "/"). -You can of course still run checkfs under a separate dir -under your "/" root dir. - -I have found the second method to be a particularly stringent -arrangement (and thus preferred when you are trying to break -something). - -Using this arrangement I was able to find that JFFS clobbered -some "sister" files on the root fs even though "checkfs" would -run fine through all its own check files. - -(I found this out when one of the clobbered sister file happened -to be /bin/bash. The system refused to run rc.local thus -preventing my "checkfs" program from being launched :) - -"checkfs": - -The "formatting" reliability of the fs as well as the file data integrity -of files on the fs can be checked using this program. - -"formatiing" reliability can only be checked via an indirect method. -If there is severe formatting reliability issues with the file system, -it will most likely cause other system failures that will prevent this -program from running successfully on a power up. This will prevent -a "ok to power me down" message from going out to the power cycling -black box and prevent power being turned off again. - -File data reliability is checked more directly. A fixed number of -files are created in the current dir (using the program "makefiles"). - -Each file has a random number of bytes in it (set by using the --s cmd line flag). The number of "ints" in the file is stored as the -first "int" in it (note: 0 length files are not allowed). Each file -is then filled with random data and a 16 bit CRC appended at the end. - -When "checkfs" is run, it runs through all files (with predetermined -file names)- one at a time- and checks for the number of "int's" -in it as well as the ending CRC. - -The program exits if the numbers of files that are corrupt are greater -that a user specified parameter (set by using the -e cmd line flag). - -If the number of corrupt files is less than this parameter, the corrupt -files are repaired and operation resumes as explained below. - -The idea behind allowing a user specified amount of corrupt files is as -follows: - -If you are testing for "formatting" reliability of a fs, and for -the data reliability of "other" files present of the fs, use -e 1. -"other" files are defined as sister files on the fs, not being written to -by the "checkfs" test program. - -As mentioned, in this case you would set -e 1, or allow at most 1 file -to be corrupt each time after a power fail. This would be the file -that was probably being written to when power failed (and CRC was not -updated to reflect the new data being written). You would check file -systems like ext2 etc. with such a configuration. -(As you have no hope that these file systems provide for either your -new data or old data to be present in the file if power failed during -the write. This is called "roll back and recover".) - -With JFFS2 I tested for such "roll back and recover" file data reliability -by setting -e 0 and making sure that all writes to the file being -updated are done in a *single* write(). - -This is how I found that JFFS2 (yet) does NOT support this functionality. -(There was a great debate if this was a bug or a feature that was lacking -or even an issue at all. See the mtd archives for more details). - -In other words, JFFS2 will partially update a file on FLASH even before -the write() command has completed, thus leaving part old data part new -data in your file if power failed in the middle of a write(). - -This is bad functionality if you are updating a binary structure or a -CRC protected file (as in our case). - - -If All Files Check Out OK: - -On the startup scan, if there are less errors than specified by the "-e flag" -a "ok to power me down message" is sent via the specified com port. - -The actual format of this message will depend on the format expected -by the power cycling box that will receive this message. One may customise -the actual message that goes out in the "do_pwr_dn)" routine in "comm.c". - -This file is called with an open file descriptor to the comm port that -this message needs to go out over and the count of the current power -cycle (in case your power cycling box can display/log this count). - -After this message has been sent out, the checkfs program goes into -a while(1) loop of writing new data (with CRC), one at a time, into -all the "check files" in the dir. - -Its life comes to a sudden end when power is asynchronously pulled from -under its feet (by your external power cycling box). - -It comes back to life when power is restored and the system boots and -checkfs is called from the rc.local script file. - -The cycle then repeats till a problem is detected, at which point -the "ok to power me down" message is not sent and the cycle stops -waiting for the user to examine the system. - - - - |