From d78b73e2ca216777e17066091ef449e9cdaffae7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Artem Bityutskiy Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:35:41 +0200 Subject: tests: move checkfs test to tests directory Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy --- tests/checkfs/README | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 173 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/checkfs/README (limited to 'tests/checkfs/README') diff --git a/tests/checkfs/README b/tests/checkfs/README new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d9966a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/checkfs/README @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ +$Id: README,v 1.2 2001/06/21 23:07:06 dwmw2 Exp $ +$Log: README,v $ +Revision 1.2 2001/06/21 23:07:06 dwmw2 +Initial import to MTD CVS + +Revision 1.1 2001/06/11 19:34:40 vipin +Added README file to dir. + + +This is the README file for the "checkfs" power fail test program. +By: Vipin Malik + +NOTE: This program requires an external "power cycling box" +connected to one of the com ports of the system under test. +This power cycling box should wait for a random amount of time +after it receives a "ok to power me down" message over the +serial port, and then yank power to the system under test. +(The box that I rigged up tested with waits anywhere from +0 to ~40 seconds). + + +It should then restore power after a few seconds and wait for the +message again. + + +ABOUT: + +This program's primary purpose it to test the reliiability +of various file systems under Linux. + +SETUP: + +You need to setup the file system you want to test and run the +"makefiles" program ONCE. This creates a set of files that are +required by the "checkfs" program. + +Also copy the "checkfs" executable program to the same dir. + +Then you need to make sure that the program "checkfs" is called +automatically on startup. You can customise the operation of +the "checkfs" program by passing it various cmd line arguments. +run "checkfs -?" for more details. + +****NOTE******* +Make sure that you call the checkfs program only after you have +mounted the file system you want to test (this is obvious), but +also after you have run any "scan" utilities to check for and +fix any file systems errors. The e2fsck is one utility for the +ext2 file system. For an automated setup you of course need to +provide these scan programs to run in standalone mode (-f -y +flags for e2fsck for example). + +File systems like JFFS and JFFS2 do not have any such external +utilities and you may call "checkfs" right after you have mounted +the respective file system under test. + +There are two ways you can mount the file system under test: + +1. Mount your root fs on a "standard" fs like ext2 and then +mount the file system under test (which may be ext2 on another +partition or device) and then run "checkfs" on this mounted +partition OR + +2. Make your fs AND device that you have put this fs as your +root fs and run "checkfs" on the root device (i.e. "/"). +You can of course still run checkfs under a separate dir +under your "/" root dir. + +I have found the second method to be a particularly stringent +arrangement (and thus preferred when you are trying to break +something). + +Using this arrangement I was able to find that JFFS clobbered +some "sister" files on the root fs even though "checkfs" would +run fine through all its own check files. + +(I found this out when one of the clobbered sister file happened +to be /bin/bash. The system refused to run rc.local thus +preventing my "checkfs" program from being launched :) + +"checkfs": + +The "formatting" reliability of the fs as well as the file data integrity +of files on the fs can be checked using this program. + +"formatiing" reliability can only be checked via an indirect method. +If there is severe formatting reliability issues with the file system, +it will most likely cause other system failures that will prevent this +program from running successfully on a power up. This will prevent +a "ok to power me down" message from going out to the power cycling +black box and prevent power being turned off again. + +File data reliability is checked more directly. A fixed number of +files are created in the current dir (using the program "makefiles"). + +Each file has a random number of bytes in it (set by using the +-s cmd line flag). The number of "ints" in the file is stored as the +first "int" in it (note: 0 length files are not allowed). Each file +is then filled with random data and a 16 bit CRC appended at the end. + +When "checkfs" is run, it runs through all files (with predetermined +file names)- one at a time- and checks for the number of "int's" +in it as well as the ending CRC. + +The program exits if the numbers of files that are corrupt are greater +that a user specified parameter (set by using the -e cmd line flag). + +If the number of corrupt files is less than this parameter, the corrupt +files are repaired and operation resumes as explained below. + +The idea behind allowing a user specified amount of corrupt files is as +follows: + +If you are testing for "formatting" reliability of a fs, and for +the data reliability of "other" files present of the fs, use -e 1. +"other" files are defined as sister files on the fs, not being written to +by the "checkfs" test program. + +As mentioned, in this case you would set -e 1, or allow at most 1 file +to be corrupt each time after a power fail. This would be the file +that was probably being written to when power failed (and CRC was not +updated to reflect the new data being written). You would check file +systems like ext2 etc. with such a configuration. +(As you have no hope that these file systems provide for either your +new data or old data to be present in the file if power failed during +the write. This is called "roll back and recover".) + +With JFFS2 I tested for such "roll back and recover" file data reliability +by setting -e 0 and making sure that all writes to the file being +updated are done in a *single* write(). + +This is how I found that JFFS2 (yet) does NOT support this functionality. +(There was a great debate if this was a bug or a feature that was lacking +or even an issue at all. See the mtd archives for more details). + +In other words, JFFS2 will partially update a file on FLASH even before +the write() command has completed, thus leaving part old data part new +data in your file if power failed in the middle of a write(). + +This is bad functionality if you are updating a binary structure or a +CRC protected file (as in our case). + + +If All Files Check Out OK: + +On the startup scan, if there are less errors than specified by the "-e flag" +a "ok to power me down message" is sent via the specified com port. + +The actual format of this message will depend on the format expected +by the power cycling box that will receive this message. One may customise +the actual message that goes out in the "do_pwr_dn)" routine in "comm.c". + +This file is called with an open file descriptor to the comm port that +this message needs to go out over and the count of the current power +cycle (in case your power cycling box can display/log this count). + +After this message has been sent out, the checkfs program goes into +a while(1) loop of writing new data (with CRC), one at a time, into +all the "check files" in the dir. + +Its life comes to a sudden end when power is asynchronously pulled from +under its feet (by your external power cycling box). + +It comes back to life when power is restored and the system boots and +checkfs is called from the rc.local script file. + +The cycle then repeats till a problem is detected, at which point +the "ok to power me down" message is not sent and the cycle stops +waiting for the user to examine the system. + + + + -- cgit v1.2.3